Comparison of Postoperative Wound Infection in Open versus Laparoscopic Appendicectomy Yousaf
نویسندگان
چکیده
Introduction: The value of laparoscopy in appendicitis is not established. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and benefits of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in a prospective randomized controlled trial. Objective: To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis in terms of post operative wound infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this randomized trial patients were divided between two groups. Only patients with acutely inflamed appendix were included in this study. During their post operative time they were assesed for the development of wound infection in ward till second post operative day , then followed in OPD for assessment of SSI.Hence efficacy of the procedure determined by the patients who maximally determined SSI. Results: The mean age and gender in both the groups were insignificant with (P=0.077) and (P=0.3321) respectively. The overall rate of SSI in LA minimum (3% versus 11.68% in the laparoscopic and open groups Respectively),which was statistically significant(P=0.03) . There was some degree of pain perceived by patients in both the groups, in group LA 37 (48.05%) perceived pain of variable degree and in OA group 77(100%) perceived pain (P=0.001).
منابع مشابه
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis: A prospective study
AIMS The purpose of this study was to compare open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) in complicated appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS We prospectively analyzed all children over a 2-year period who underwent appendicectomy in a single institution and found 30 cases of complicated appendicitis diagnosed on the table and confirmed by histopathology. These children were allocated randoml...
متن کاملLaparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: An Indian perspective
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic appendicectomy though widely practiced has not gained universal approval. Laparoscopic appendicectomy in India is relatively new and the literature is scant. This study was aimed to compare laparoscopic with open appendicectomy and ascertain the therapeutic benefit, if any, in the overall management of acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study group consisted...
متن کاملA Study of Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendicectomy
Background:Appendicectomy has been the treatment of choice for acute appendicitis. Since advent Laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) has struggled to prove its superiority over the open technique. This is in contrast to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which has promptly become the gold standard for gallstone disease. Open appendicectomy (OA) has withstood the test of time for more than a century. The...
متن کاملSystematic review and meta-analysis of safety of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis in pregnancy
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic appendicectomy has gained wide acceptance as an alternative to open appendicectomy during pregnancy. However, data regarding the safety and optimal surgical approach to appendicitis in pregnancy are still controversial. METHODS This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy in pregnancy identified using PubMed a...
متن کاملREDUCED INCIDENCE OF EARLY COMPLICATIONS OF SURGICAL WOUNDS IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY
ABSTRACT Background: The incidence of early wound related complications is assessed in laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgeries. Complications of surgical wounds (esp. wound infections) are considered as a major problem in surgery wards. Complications of surgical wounds are classified as early and late. Common and early complications are hematoma, seroma and wound infection. Methods: The m...
متن کامل